by Grant Gerlock, NET News/Harvest Public Media
Gayland Regier carries buckets of feed to his cattle in southeast Nebraska. Imported cattle make up a small portion of the American beef supply, but many American farmers and ranchers are concerned that foreign-sourced meat could distort their markets. (Photo by Grant Gerlock, NET News/Harvest Public Media)
February 24, 2015 – 6:44am
In the small print on meat packages at the grocery store is a note on where the livestock was born, raised, and slaughtered. That piece of information is at the center of an ongoing international trade dispute that has swept up Nebraska ranchers.
The 2002 Farm Bill was the first to require country of origin labeling on meat. After seven years of rulemaking and legal wrangling, the labels finally reached supermarket shelves in 2009. Now, a ruling by an international trade agency may peel them back off again.
You have probably seen, but may not have noticed, labels saying something like “Born, Raised, & Harvest in the U.S.A.” or “Born and Raised in Canada, Slaughtered in the U.S.” Those are country of origin labels. With over 90 percent of the beef, pork, and poultry consumed in the U.S., it may be unusual to come across anything other than American made meat, but many ranchers want you to see it for yourself.
Gayland Regier is one of those ranchers. Regier grows corn and soybeans and has a small herd of cattle near Beatrice in southeast Nebraska. On a cold, windy afternoon he carried a couple buckets of feed into a cattle corral and his calves came running.
Gayland Regier raises cattle, and farms corn and soybeans in southeast Nebraska. He thinks meat should be labeled like other consumer products, from toys to tools. (Photo by Grant Gerlock, NET News/Harvest Public Media)
“I have pride in the way we take care of cattle, the way they’re treated,” Regier said. “I shouldn’t say it but I tend to love each one of ‘em. But they’d probably tell me, ‘Not if I’m going to slaughter.’”
Of course, his calves will someday end up on a supermarket shelf. When they do, Regier wants the label to clearly state the meat was made in America. For Regier and other ranchers, “Buy American” is still a good marketing slogan, whether you’re selling cars or cattle.
“The meatpackers want to make the meat product that comes from the foreign countries a generic product which doesn’t’ require labeling,” Regier said.
Meat packing companies have indeed fought country of origin labels since they were created in 2002. So have livestock producers in Canada and Mexico, and they may be closer to peeling them off.
Mark Dopp of the North American Meat Institute says the labels are an economic burden. Packers have to keep track of where animals are born, raised, and slaughtered. The easiest way to do that is to separate imported livestock from American animals.
"So the coolers are segregated, the lines are segregated, because when the products get to the retail, the retailer needs to know what labels go on what product,” Dopp said.
The labels don’t have anything to do with food safety. And they don’t make it easier to trace food back to the farm. But to keep things simple Dopp says some packing plants and grocery stores could decide to go all-American. That would hurt the market for, say, a Canadian rancher hoping to sell to the U.S.
“If we’re a country that believes in free trade and if we’re a country that believes in adhering to our international trade obligations, is it appropriate for the United States to have a statutory scheme that discriminates against certain producers?” Dopp asked.
Most beef comes boxed in large cuts that are broken down at the supermarket. The information on the box tells retailers what to say on the country of origin label shoppers find on the shelf. (Photo by Grant Gerlock, NET News/Harvest Public Media)
Canada and Mexico took that question to the World Trade Organization. Last fall, they won. The WTO said the information on country of origin labels on meat is not worth enough to consumers for what it costs the industry.
Kansas State University agricultural economist, Glynn Tonsor, analyzed checkout data that suggests shoppers tend to pay more attention to things like price. Country of origin isn’t really influencing what people buy.
“That makes one a little bit pessimistic about whether there’s a real benefit, from a consumer demand perspective,” Tonsor said.
But Patty Lovera of the consumer advocacy group Food and Water Watch says surveys have shown consumers do want to know where their meat comes from. How they act on that information, she says, is up to them.
“To be having this fight is kind of amazing when the trend on everything else on food is giving people more information,” Lovera said. “These guys are fighting to not give this basic stuff.”
The debate over country of origin labels continues at the WTO. The U.S. appealed the ruling against the labels. But with Canada threatening trade sanctions, Congress may move first. Lawmakers could repeal the labels, or change the language to something like “raised and slaughtered in North America.”
To farmer and rancher Gayland Regier, that wouldn’t be saying much. He’s concerned meat packers could use imported cattle to water down prices for American ranchers. Labeling makes that harder to do.
“Especially with the movement toward more global open markets," Regier said. "They label it by name brands. How about us as wholesale cattle producers. Why can’t we differentiate it from that which comes in from other foreign countries?”
With meat companies extending their influence beyond the borders of the U.S., American producers are concerned about how they’re going to stand out against global competition.