For Immediate Release: NFU Deeply Frustrated, Angry With Possible COOL Repeal; Notes Language Goes Beyond WTO Dispute


I read the NFU press release below. Amen. It is well done and on point. The level of frustration cuts deep as the many thousands of hours and hundreds of thousands of dollars

Farmers Union members have invested in the advocacy for and defense of COOL is considered. For Nebraska Farmers Union, that commitment of time and resources dates back

to 1984. That said, I am proud of our Farmers Union organization did everything possible to avoid the outright appeal of COOL. We fought with both skill and courage.

Good for us. Win or lose, I never regret doing the right things for the right reasons.

The credit goes to the money and political power of the meatpackers and their organizational helpers in the ag sector that provided them the political cover they

needed, the binding and conflict of interest ridden and completely dysfunctional WTO dispute resolution structure, and the compliant and complicit Congress who did their

bidding. U.S. food consumers will lose their ability to know where their food comes from, and U.S. food producers will lose their ability to identify and differentiate their own products

in their own domestic market. This will put the U.S. at a competitive disadvantage with the rest of the food producing world.

Don’t you just hate it when special interests win out over public interests?

All the best,

John K. Hansen, President

Nebraska Farmers Union

1305 Plum Street, Lincoln, NE 68502

402-476-8815 Office 402-476-8859 Fax

402-476-8608 Home 402-580-8815 Cell



December 16, 2015

Contact: Andrew Jerome, 202-314-3106


NFU Deeply Frustrated, Angry With Possible COOL Repeal;

Notes Language Goes Beyond WTO Dispute

WASHINGTON (December 16, 2015) – National Farmers Union (NFU) President Roger Johnson said the organization was deeply frustrated and angered by language that would repeal the popular Country-of-Origin Labeling (COOL) law for not only muscle cuts of beef and pork, but extending to trade-compliant ground beef and ground pork.

"Congress had a solution to make COOL compliant with our World Trade Organization (WTO) obligations sitting on their desks for 5 months," said Johnson. "Instead, they gave in to demands to completely remove most aspects of COOL for meat that provided meaningful information to the pubic," he said. “This is the type of legislative hocus pocus that has angered so many Americans,” he said.

The language to repeal most significant components of COOL is contained as a rider in the 2016 Appropriations Act. Johnson noted that the language goes well beyond the WTO dispute, repealing COOL for ground beef and pork – two products that were explicitly found to be trade compliant.

“Clearly this language was produced by long-time COOL opponents who legislated in the dark of the night under the guise of solving an issue, when really their intentions completely undermine the will of American consumers and producers,” said Johnson. “NFU is furious that yet again the dysfunction of Congress has enabled this to happen.”

Johnson pointed out that voluntary COOL, supported by both sides of the aisle and contained in legislation introduced in the U.S. Senate earlier this year, would solve the WTO dispute while still maintaining the integrity of the COOL label. With this omnibus language, packers will be able to once again deliberately deceive consumers. He says that having to go the way of a rider is yet another example of Congress’ inability to live up to their promise to restore regular order.

“Year after year, Congress kowtows to well moneyed interests instead of standing up for consumers and family farmers by attaching unpopular provisions – like repeal of COOL – to must-pass appropriations bills,” he said. “This year’s COOL rider is yet another example of the inability of Congress to legislate in the public interest.”

National Farmers Union has been working since 1902 to protect and enhance the economic well-being and quality of life for family farmers, ranchers and rural communities through advocating grassroots-driven policy positions adopted by its membership.